Video production companies: procurement review
Use this procurement review exercise to answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process. You are discussing a product demonstration video with a marketing lead planning a product launch. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.
Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence.
The situation
In this fictional brief, the audience sees features but cannot understand the product’s use in context. The buyer wants a concise demonstration of one useful customer workflow. Your offer is a product demonstration video, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.
A relevant delivery constraint is that product access and on-camera approvals must arrive before filming. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.
| Your counterpart | a marketing lead planning a product launch |
|---|---|
| Offer under discussion | a product demonstration video |
| Evidence available | a storyboard with the viewer’s question beside each shot |
| Terms to clarify | Define shoot days, locations, revisions, music rights and final formats. |
How to approach procurement review
A useful question for this stage: “Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.
- Separate mandatory requirements from preferences. Assign owners to unanswered questions. Compare commercial terms on a consistent basis.
- Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “What should a viewer be able to explain after the first 30 seconds?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
- Use evidence relevant to the decision: a storyboard with the viewer’s question beside each shot. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
- Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence.
An industry-specific concern
Buyer: “Can we add another location without changing the budget?”
Possible response: “We can price the additional location or replace an existing setup. Let us compare the production time and the story each option supports.”
Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.
Run the practice
- Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays a marketing lead planning a product launch. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
- Have a five-minute conversation focused on answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
- Add this challenge: Procurement asks for a new obligation late in the process. Explain that it needs review rather than accepting it to save the deal.
- Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
- Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to approve a storyboard and a short test sequence before the main shoot. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.
What to avoid
| Common mistake | Promising exceptions that the delivery or legal team has not approved. |
|---|---|
| A stronger direction | I can record that request and confirm the answer with the responsible person before we change the agreement. |
| Scope and claim boundary | Do not invent viewing benchmarks or promise a viral result. |
| What to measure in real work | completion of the key demonstration segment and relevant next actions. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change. |
An example conversation
Which requirements must be satisfied before procurement can approve the agreement?
Our concern is that the audience sees features but cannot understand the product’s use in context. Also, product access and on-camera approvals must arrive before filming.
What should a viewer be able to explain after the first 30 seconds?
Can we add another location without changing the budget?
We can price the additional location or replace an existing setup. Let us compare the production time and the story each option supports.
Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it?
Your working sheet.
Make the exercise your own. Notes are saved in this browser when storage is available. Download a copy to keep; avoid confidential information on a shared device.
Example: the audience sees features but cannot understand the product’s use in context; product access and on-camera approvals must arrive before filming.
Example: Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it? Industry question: What should a viewer be able to explain after the first 30 seconds?
Example: a storyboard with the viewer’s question beside each shot. Do not invent viewing benchmarks or promise a viral result.
Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: approve a storyboard and a short test sequence before the main shoot. Confirm the owner and date.
Review your work
This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.
Questions
Who is this video production companies exercise for?+
Can I use the example as a script?+
How should I assess the result?+
Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale.
Explore more sales resourcesTake the conversation further.
Read a practical guide to structuring your sales practice, or explore the current London sales masterclass.
Plan your sales practiceExplore Jordan Belfort in London