Sales practice · 12-minute exercise

Project management software: procurement review

Use this procurement review exercise to answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process. You are discussing a shared project planning workspace with an operations lead at a professional-services firm. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.

NEXT MBA EditorialPublished Example + editable working sheet
What you will work towards

Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence.

The situation

In this fictional brief, client deadlines live in different spreadsheets and dependency changes arrive late. The buyer wants a single view of owners, dependencies and delivery dates. Your offer is a shared project planning workspace, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.

A relevant delivery constraint is that client teams must retain access to an export of their work. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.

Your counterpartan operations lead at a professional-services firm
Offer under discussiona shared project planning workspace
Evidence availablea sample project with one late dependency and the resulting schedule change
Terms to clarifyAgree who imports data, maintains the plan and owns exit exports.

How to approach procurement review

A useful question for this stage: “Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.

  1. Separate mandatory requirements from preferences. Assign owners to unanswered questions. Compare commercial terms on a consistent basis.
  2. Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which handover creates the most rework when a delivery date changes?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
  3. Use evidence relevant to the decision: a sample project with one late dependency and the resulting schedule change. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
  4. Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence.

Example exchange

An illustrative exchange. Real conversations will take a different path.

SellerWhich requirements must be satisfied before procurement can approve the agreement?

BuyerOur concern is that client deadlines live in different spreadsheets and dependency changes arrive late. Also, client teams must retain access to an export of their work.

SellerWhich handover creates the most rework when a delivery date changes?

BuyerAnother tool will just add more administration.

SellerLet us time the current weekly update and compare the same update on one sample project before asking everyone to move.

SellerWhich item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it?

An industry-specific concern

Buyer: “Another tool will just add more administration.”

Possible response: “Let us time the current weekly update and compare the same update on one sample project before asking everyone to move.”

Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.

Run the practice

  1. Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays an operations lead at a professional-services firm. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
  2. Have a five-minute conversation focused on answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
  3. Add this challenge: Procurement asks for a new obligation late in the process. Explain that it needs review rather than accepting it to save the deal.
  4. Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
  5. Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to run one internal project for two weekly planning cycles. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.

What to avoid

Common mistakePromising exceptions that the delivery or legal team has not approved.
A stronger directionI can record that request and confirm the answer with the responsible person before we change the agreement.
Scope and claim boundaryDo not present feature count as proof of adoption.
What to measure in real worktime spent preparing the weekly delivery update. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change.

Your working sheet

Write your own version below. Notes are saved on this browser when local storage is available. Use Download to keep a separate copy; avoid adding confidential information on a shared device.

Example: client deadlines live in different spreadsheets and dependency changes arrive late; client teams must retain access to an export of their work.

Example: Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it? Industry question: Which handover creates the most rework when a delivery date changes?

Example: a sample project with one late dependency and the resulting schedule change. Do not present feature count as proof of adoption.

Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: run one internal project for two weekly planning cycles. Confirm the owner and date.

Review your work

Tick only what you can support with your answer or practice. This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.

Questions about this resource

Who is this project management software exercise for?

Founders, salespeople and account managers preparing for a conversation about a shared project planning workspace. Adapt the brief to your real offer and authority before using it at work.

Can I use the example as a script?

Use the questions as prompts. Listen and respond to the buyer’s actual meaning. The target is to answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process, not to deliver a memorised speech.

How should I assess the result?

Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence. Use the three review questions below. The checklist is for reflection; it is not a validated prediction of sales performance.

Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale. About these resources.