Management consulting: discovery call
Use this discovery call exercise to understand the problem, its consequences and the buying process before presenting a solution. You are discussing a focused operating-model review with a CEO dealing with a stalled operational initiative. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.
Summarise a verified problem, an unresolved question and a next step the buyer has accepted.
The situation
In this fictional brief, teams disagree about who owns the next decision. The buyer wants an agreed decision map and a practical implementation sequence. Your offer is a focused operating-model review, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.
A relevant delivery constraint is that the client team has limited time for interviews and workshops. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.
| Your counterpart | a CEO dealing with a stalled operational initiative |
|---|---|
| Offer under discussion | a focused operating-model review |
| Evidence available | a worked example of roles, decision rights and escalation paths |
| Terms to clarify | Define access to stakeholders, deliverables, decision owners and handover. |
How to approach discovery call
A useful question for this stage: “What have you already tried, and what changed as a result?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.
- Start with an actual recent incident. Follow its sequence and ask who was affected. Separate what you heard from your interpretation.
- Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which unresolved decision is holding the initiative back today?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
- Use evidence relevant to the decision: a worked example of roles, decision rights and escalation paths. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
- Summarise a verified problem, an unresolved question and a next step the buyer has accepted.
An industry-specific concern
Buyer: “Consultants leave us with slides and no execution.”
Possible response: “Let us define the decisions, owners and implementation artefacts you need, and make handover a named deliverable.”
Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.
Run the practice
- Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays a CEO dealing with a stalled operational initiative. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
- Have a five-minute conversation focused on understand the problem, its consequences and the buying process before presenting a solution. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
- Add this challenge: The buyer says everything is fine until you ask about a specific recent example. Do not invent a pain point for them.
- Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
- Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to map one cross-team process and test the proposed ownership with its participants. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.
What to avoid
| Common mistake | Running through a long questionnaire without following up on an important answer. |
|---|---|
| A stronger direction | You mentioned a missed handover. What happened immediately after that? |
| Scope and claim boundary | Separate your recommendations from outcomes that depend on client execution. |
| What to measure in real work | the number of blocked decisions resolved with named owners. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change. |
An example conversation
Before we discuss a solution, could you walk me through what happens today?
Our concern is that teams disagree about who owns the next decision. Also, the client team has limited time for interviews and workshops.
Which unresolved decision is holding the initiative back today?
Consultants leave us with slides and no execution.
Let us define the decisions, owners and implementation artefacts you need, and make handover a named deliverable.
What have you already tried, and what changed as a result?
Your working sheet.
Make the exercise your own. Notes are saved in this browser when storage is available. Download a copy to keep; avoid confidential information on a shared device.
Example: teams disagree about who owns the next decision; the client team has limited time for interviews and workshops.
Example: What have you already tried, and what changed as a result? Industry question: Which unresolved decision is holding the initiative back today?
Example: a worked example of roles, decision rights and escalation paths. Separate your recommendations from outcomes that depend on client execution.
Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: map one cross-team process and test the proposed ownership with its participants. Confirm the owner and date.
Review your work
This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.
Questions
Who is this management consulting exercise for?+
Can I use the example as a script?+
How should I assess the result?+
Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale.
Explore more sales resourcesTake the conversation further.
Read a practical guide to structuring your sales practice, or explore the current London sales masterclass.
Plan your sales practiceExplore Jordan Belfort in London