Sales practice · 12-minute exercise

Facilities management: scope negotiation

Use this scope negotiation exercise to make changes to deliverables and responsibilities visible before agreeing a revised price or deadline. You are discussing a planned maintenance coordination service with a property operations lead. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.

NEXT MBA EditorialPublished Example + editable working sheet
What you will work towards

Produce a written scope decision with inclusions, exclusions, assumptions and approval.

The situation

In this fictional brief, maintenance dates and contractor responsibilities are scattered. The buyer wants a visible schedule with assigned owners and escalation rules. Your offer is a planned maintenance coordination service, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.

A relevant delivery constraint is that some equipment needs specialist or manufacturer-authorised work. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.

Your counterparta property operations lead
Offer under discussiona planned maintenance coordination service
Evidence availablea sample asset register linked to work orders and completion records
Terms to clarifyClarify which party commissions, performs, verifies and pays for each task.

How to approach scope negotiation

A useful question for this stage: “If we keep the current budget, which existing item should this replace?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.

  1. List the requested change. Explain its effect on work, dependencies and timing. Offer a clear trade-off that the buyer can evaluate.
  2. Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which asset failure would interrupt the most important activity?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
  3. Use evidence relevant to the decision: a sample asset register linked to work orders and completion records. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
  4. Produce a written scope decision with inclusions, exclusions, assumptions and approval.

Example exchange

An illustrative exchange. Real conversations will take a different path.

SellerWhich part of the outcome is essential, and which part could wait?

BuyerOur concern is that maintenance dates and contractor responsibilities are scattered. Also, some equipment needs specialist or manufacturer-authorised work.

SellerWhich asset failure would interrupt the most important activity?

BuyerWe can coordinate the contractors ourselves.

SellerYou may be able to. Let us compare the coordination workload, missed handovers and responsibility for tracking completion.

SellerIf we keep the current budget, which existing item should this replace?

An industry-specific concern

Buyer: “We can coordinate the contractors ourselves.”

Possible response: “You may be able to. Let us compare the coordination workload, missed handovers and responsibility for tracking completion.”

Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.

Run the practice

  1. Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays a property operations lead. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
  2. Have a five-minute conversation focused on make changes to deliverables and responsibilities visible before agreeing a revised price or deadline. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
  3. Add this challenge: The buyer describes a substantial change as a small tweak. Ask for the actual requirement and assess it without arguing about the label.
  4. Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
  5. Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to map a limited asset group and its next scheduled maintenance cycle. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.

What to avoid

Common mistakeAccepting extra work verbally and hoping the team can absorb it.
A stronger directionWe can include that change once we agree what it replaces or how it changes the estimate.
Scope and claim boundaryDo not substitute a generic checklist for statutory or specialist inspection requirements.
What to measure in real workscheduled tasks completed with acceptable evidence. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change.

Your working sheet

Write your own version below. Notes are saved on this browser when local storage is available. Use Download to keep a separate copy; avoid adding confidential information on a shared device.

Example: maintenance dates and contractor responsibilities are scattered; some equipment needs specialist or manufacturer-authorised work.

Example: If we keep the current budget, which existing item should this replace? Industry question: Which asset failure would interrupt the most important activity?

Example: a sample asset register linked to work orders and completion records. Do not substitute a generic checklist for statutory or specialist inspection requirements.

Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: map a limited asset group and its next scheduled maintenance cycle. Confirm the owner and date.

Review your work

Tick only what you can support with your answer or practice. This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.

Questions about this resource

Who is this facilities management exercise for?

Founders, salespeople and account managers preparing for a conversation about a planned maintenance coordination service. Adapt the brief to your real offer and authority before using it at work.

Can I use the example as a script?

Use the questions as prompts. Listen and respond to the buyer’s actual meaning. The target is to make changes to deliverables and responsibilities visible before agreeing a revised price or deadline, not to deliver a memorised speech.

How should I assess the result?

Produce a written scope decision with inclusions, exclusions, assumptions and approval. Use the three review questions below. The checklist is for reflection; it is not a validated prediction of sales performance.

Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale. About these resources.