Facilities management: price objection handling
Use this price objection handling exercise to identify whether the concern is affordability, comparison, confidence or scope before discussing a concession. You are discussing a planned maintenance coordination service with a property operations lead. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.
Agree what drives the concern and compare at least two honest options, including keeping the original scope.
The situation
In this fictional brief, maintenance dates and contractor responsibilities are scattered. The buyer wants a visible schedule with assigned owners and escalation rules. Your offer is a planned maintenance coordination service, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.
A relevant delivery constraint is that some equipment needs specialist or manufacturer-authorised work. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.
| Your counterpart | a property operations lead |
|---|---|
| Offer under discussion | a planned maintenance coordination service |
| Evidence available | a sample asset register linked to work orders and completion records |
| Terms to clarify | Clarify which party commissions, performs, verifies and pays for each task. |
How to approach price objection handling
A useful question for this stage: “If the price stayed the same, which part of the proposal would still feel uncertain?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.
- Acknowledge the concern. Identify the comparison and the decision criterion. Make the scope visible before discussing alternatives.
- Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which asset failure would interrupt the most important activity?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
- Use evidence relevant to the decision: a sample asset register linked to work orders and completion records. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
- Agree what drives the concern and compare at least two honest options, including keeping the original scope.
An industry-specific concern
Buyer: “We can coordinate the contractors ourselves.”
Possible response: “You may be able to. Let us compare the coordination workload, missed handovers and responsibility for tracking completion.”
Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.
Run the practice
- Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays a property operations lead. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
- Have a five-minute conversation focused on identify whether the concern is affordability, comparison, confidence or scope before discussing a concession. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
- Add this challenge: The buyer asks for an immediate percentage discount. You can change scope or timing, but you cannot invent margin or authority.
- Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
- Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to map a limited asset group and its next scheduled maintenance cycle. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.
What to avoid
| Common mistake | Offering a discount before discovering what the buyer is worried about. |
|---|---|
| A stronger direction | Let us check whether we are comparing the same scope and responsibilities first. |
| Scope and claim boundary | Do not substitute a generic checklist for statutory or specialist inspection requirements. |
| What to measure in real work | scheduled tasks completed with acceptable evidence. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change. |
An example conversation
When you say the price is too high, what are you comparing it with?
Our concern is that maintenance dates and contractor responsibilities are scattered. Also, some equipment needs specialist or manufacturer-authorised work.
Which asset failure would interrupt the most important activity?
We can coordinate the contractors ourselves.
You may be able to. Let us compare the coordination workload, missed handovers and responsibility for tracking completion.
If the price stayed the same, which part of the proposal would still feel uncertain?
Your working sheet.
Make the exercise your own. Notes are saved in this browser when storage is available. Download a copy to keep; avoid confidential information on a shared device.
Example: maintenance dates and contractor responsibilities are scattered; some equipment needs specialist or manufacturer-authorised work.
Example: If the price stayed the same, which part of the proposal would still feel uncertain? Industry question: Which asset failure would interrupt the most important activity?
Example: a sample asset register linked to work orders and completion records. Do not substitute a generic checklist for statutory or specialist inspection requirements.
Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: map a limited asset group and its next scheduled maintenance cycle. Confirm the owner and date.
Review your work
This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.
Questions
Who is this facilities management exercise for?+
Can I use the example as a script?+
How should I assess the result?+
Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale.
Explore more sales resourcesTake the conversation further.
Read a practical guide to structuring your sales practice, or explore the current London sales masterclass.
Plan your sales practiceExplore Jordan Belfort in London