Sales practice · 12-minute exercise

Facilities management: payment terms discussion

Use this payment terms discussion exercise to clarify the payment process and discuss workable terms within your actual authority. You are discussing a planned maintenance coordination service with a property operations lead. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.

NEXT MBA EditorialPublished Example + editable working sheet
What you will work towards

Reach a documented proposal for terms or identify the approval needed; do not give legal advice.

The situation

In this fictional brief, maintenance dates and contractor responsibilities are scattered. The buyer wants a visible schedule with assigned owners and escalation rules. Your offer is a planned maintenance coordination service, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.

A relevant delivery constraint is that some equipment needs specialist or manufacturer-authorised work. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.

Your counterparta property operations lead
Offer under discussiona planned maintenance coordination service
Evidence availablea sample asset register linked to work orders and completion records
Terms to clarifyClarify which party commissions, performs, verifies and pays for each task.

How to approach payment terms discussion

A useful question for this stage: “Which part of the proposed schedule conflicts with your approval process?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.

  1. Separate payment timing, invoicing milestones and scope acceptance. Explain the work or cost each milestone covers.
  2. Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which asset failure would interrupt the most important activity?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
  3. Use evidence relevant to the decision: a sample asset register linked to work orders and completion records. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
  4. Reach a documented proposal for terms or identify the approval needed; do not give legal advice.

Example exchange

An illustrative exchange. Real conversations will take a different path.

SellerHow do invoices move from approval to payment in your organisation?

BuyerOur concern is that maintenance dates and contractor responsibilities are scattered. Also, some equipment needs specialist or manufacturer-authorised work.

SellerWhich asset failure would interrupt the most important activity?

BuyerWe can coordinate the contractors ourselves.

SellerYou may be able to. Let us compare the coordination workload, missed handovers and responsibility for tracking completion.

SellerWhich part of the proposed schedule conflicts with your approval process?

An industry-specific concern

Buyer: “We can coordinate the contractors ourselves.”

Possible response: “You may be able to. Let us compare the coordination workload, missed handovers and responsibility for tracking completion.”

Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.

Run the practice

  1. Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays a property operations lead. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
  2. Have a five-minute conversation focused on clarify the payment process and discuss workable terms within your actual authority. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
  3. Add this challenge: The buyer asks for an exception you cannot authorise. Acknowledge the request and state the review process.
  4. Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
  5. Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to map a limited asset group and its next scheduled maintenance cycle. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.

What to avoid

Common mistakeConfusing a verbal promise with an approved payment arrangement.
A stronger directionLet us write down the agreed milestones and have the responsible people confirm them before work begins.
Scope and claim boundaryDo not substitute a generic checklist for statutory or specialist inspection requirements.
What to measure in real workscheduled tasks completed with acceptable evidence. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change.

Your working sheet

Write your own version below. Notes are saved on this browser when local storage is available. Use Download to keep a separate copy; avoid adding confidential information on a shared device.

Example: maintenance dates and contractor responsibilities are scattered; some equipment needs specialist or manufacturer-authorised work.

Example: Which part of the proposed schedule conflicts with your approval process? Industry question: Which asset failure would interrupt the most important activity?

Example: a sample asset register linked to work orders and completion records. Do not substitute a generic checklist for statutory or specialist inspection requirements.

Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: map a limited asset group and its next scheduled maintenance cycle. Confirm the owner and date.

Review your work

Tick only what you can support with your answer or practice. This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.

Questions about this resource

Who is this facilities management exercise for?

Founders, salespeople and account managers preparing for a conversation about a planned maintenance coordination service. Adapt the brief to your real offer and authority before using it at work.

Can I use the example as a script?

Use the questions as prompts. Listen and respond to the buyer’s actual meaning. The target is to clarify the payment process and discuss workable terms within your actual authority, not to deliver a memorised speech.

How should I assess the result?

Reach a documented proposal for terms or identify the approval needed; do not give legal advice. Use the three review questions below. The checklist is for reflection; it is not a validated prediction of sales performance.

Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale. About these resources.