Sales practice · 12-minute exercise

Event production companies: pilot proposal

Use this pilot proposal exercise to design a small engagement that resolves a real uncertainty and has a clear stop or proceed decision. You are discussing a staged production and technical delivery package with an organiser delivering a business conference. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.

NEXT MBA EditorialPublished Example + editable working sheet
What you will work towards

Agree a bounded trial with evidence requirements and a review date, without implying expansion is automatic.

The situation

In this fictional brief, speakers, room layout and technical requirements change on separate documents. The buyer wants one approved running order with clear technical responsibilities. Your offer is a staged production and technical delivery package, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.

A relevant delivery constraint is that venue access, loading and rehearsal time are fixed. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.

Your counterpartan organiser delivering a business conference
Offer under discussiona staged production and technical delivery package
Evidence availablea sample show flow, equipment plan and escalation list
Terms to clarifySeparate equipment, crew, transport, overtime and venue-provided services.

How to approach pilot proposal

A useful question for this stage: “What evidence would make you decide not to expand?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.

  1. Define a narrow scope, a baseline, an owner and success criteria. Include a stop condition and the decision after the pilot.
  2. Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which programme moment would be hardest to recover if it failed?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
  3. Use evidence relevant to the decision: a sample show flow, equipment plan and escalation list. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
  4. Agree a bounded trial with evidence requirements and a review date, without implying expansion is automatic.

Example exchange

An illustrative exchange. Real conversations will take a different path.

SellerWhich question would a small trial need to answer before you considered a wider engagement?

BuyerOur concern is that speakers, room layout and technical requirements change on separate documents. Also, venue access, loading and rehearsal time are fixed.

SellerWhich programme moment would be hardest to recover if it failed?

BuyerCan you include a second room for the same price?

SellerWe can assess the extra crew, equipment and rehearsal requirements, then compare a revised scope with the current plan.

SellerWhat evidence would make you decide not to expand?

An industry-specific concern

Buyer: “Can you include a second room for the same price?”

Possible response: “We can assess the extra crew, equipment and rehearsal requirements, then compare a revised scope with the current plan.”

Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.

Run the practice

  1. Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays an organiser delivering a business conference. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
  2. Have a five-minute conversation focused on design a small engagement that resolves a real uncertainty and has a clear stop or proceed decision. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
  3. Add this challenge: The buyer wants an open-ended free trial. Explain the work involved and propose a finite evaluation with clear responsibilities.
  4. Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
  5. Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to review one critical session from load-in through rehearsal and show delivery. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.

What to avoid

Common mistakeCalling a discounted full project a pilot without a learning objective.
A stronger directionLet us test the uncertain part first and agree what the result will and will not tell us.
Scope and claim boundaryDo not describe unconfirmed speakers, venues or capacity as booked.
What to measure in real workcompletion of agreed technical and rehearsal checkpoints. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change.

Your working sheet

Write your own version below. Notes are saved on this browser when local storage is available. Use Download to keep a separate copy; avoid adding confidential information on a shared device.

Example: speakers, room layout and technical requirements change on separate documents; venue access, loading and rehearsal time are fixed.

Example: What evidence would make you decide not to expand? Industry question: Which programme moment would be hardest to recover if it failed?

Example: a sample show flow, equipment plan and escalation list. Do not describe unconfirmed speakers, venues or capacity as booked.

Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: review one critical session from load-in through rehearsal and show delivery. Confirm the owner and date.

Review your work

Tick only what you can support with your answer or practice. This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.

Questions about this resource

Who is this event production companies exercise for?

Founders, salespeople and account managers preparing for a conversation about a staged production and technical delivery package. Adapt the brief to your real offer and authority before using it at work.

Can I use the example as a script?

Use the questions as prompts. Listen and respond to the buyer’s actual meaning. The target is to design a small engagement that resolves a real uncertainty and has a clear stop or proceed decision, not to deliver a memorised speech.

How should I assess the result?

Agree a bounded trial with evidence requirements and a review date, without implying expansion is automatic. Use the three review questions below. The checklist is for reflection; it is not a validated prediction of sales performance.

Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale. About these resources.