Event production companies: lost-deal review
Use this lost-deal review exercise to learn from a buying decision without turning the feedback conversation into another pitch. You are discussing a staged production and technical delivery package with an organiser delivering a business conference. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.
Record a useful learning, its evidence and a specific improvement to test in future deals.
The situation
In this fictional brief, speakers, room layout and technical requirements change on separate documents. The buyer wants one approved running order with clear technical responsibilities. Your offer is a staged production and technical delivery package, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.
A relevant delivery constraint is that venue access, loading and rehearsal time are fixed. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.
| Your counterpart | an organiser delivering a business conference |
|---|---|
| Offer under discussion | a staged production and technical delivery package |
| Evidence available | a sample show flow, equipment plan and escalation list |
| Terms to clarify | Separate equipment, crew, transport, overtime and venue-provided services. |
How to approach lost-deal review
A useful question for this stage: “At what point did one option become a better fit for you?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.
- Ask permission, keep the discussion short and explore the decision process. Record direct feedback separately from your interpretation.
- Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which programme moment would be hardest to recover if it failed?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
- Use evidence relevant to the decision: a sample show flow, equipment plan and escalation list. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
- Record a useful learning, its evidence and a specific improvement to test in future deals.
An industry-specific concern
Buyer: “Can you include a second room for the same price?”
Possible response: “We can assess the extra crew, equipment and rehearsal requirements, then compare a revised scope with the current plan.”
Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.
Run the practice
- Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays an organiser delivering a business conference. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
- Have a five-minute conversation focused on learn from a buying decision without turning the feedback conversation into another pitch. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
- Add this challenge: The buyer gives a polite, vague answer. Ask one concrete follow-up, then respect their decision to stop.
- Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
- Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to review one critical session from load-in through rehearsal and show delivery. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.
What to avoid
| Common mistake | Arguing with feedback or asking questions designed to prove the buyer was wrong. |
|---|---|
| A stronger direction | Thank you. What would we have needed to understand earlier? |
| Scope and claim boundary | Do not describe unconfirmed speakers, venues or capacity as booked. |
| What to measure in real work | completion of agreed technical and rehearsal checkpoints. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change. |
An example conversation
If you are comfortable sharing, what mattered most in your decision?
Our concern is that speakers, room layout and technical requirements change on separate documents. Also, venue access, loading and rehearsal time are fixed.
Which programme moment would be hardest to recover if it failed?
Can you include a second room for the same price?
We can assess the extra crew, equipment and rehearsal requirements, then compare a revised scope with the current plan.
At what point did one option become a better fit for you?
Your working sheet.
Make the exercise your own. Notes are saved in this browser when storage is available. Download a copy to keep; avoid confidential information on a shared device.
Example: speakers, room layout and technical requirements change on separate documents; venue access, loading and rehearsal time are fixed.
Example: At what point did one option become a better fit for you? Industry question: Which programme moment would be hardest to recover if it failed?
Example: a sample show flow, equipment plan and escalation list. Do not describe unconfirmed speakers, venues or capacity as booked.
Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: review one critical session from load-in through rehearsal and show delivery. Confirm the owner and date.
Review your work
This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.
Questions
Who is this event production companies exercise for?+
Can I use the example as a script?+
How should I assess the result?+
Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale.
Explore more sales resourcesTake the conversation further.
Read a practical guide to structuring your sales practice, or explore the current London sales masterclass.
Plan your sales practiceExplore Jordan Belfort in London