Coworking spaces: account expansion
Use this account expansion exercise to explore an additional need only after establishing that the existing work is useful. You are discussing a flexible team workspace agreement with an operations manager arranging space for a hybrid team. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.
Identify a genuinely useful additional scope or decide that expansion would be premature.
The situation
In this fictional brief, attendance varies and meeting rooms are difficult to reserve. The buyer wants a workspace arrangement matched to actual attendance and meeting needs. Your offer is a flexible team workspace agreement, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.
A relevant delivery constraint is that peak meeting times and access requirements must fit the available space. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.
| Your counterpart | an operations manager arranging space for a hybrid team |
|---|---|
| Offer under discussion | a flexible team workspace agreement |
| Evidence available | a tour using the team’s proposed weekly schedule |
| Terms to clarify | Clarify deposits, access hours, guests, room allowances and notice periods. |
How to approach account expansion
A useful question for this stage: “What is different about that team’s requirements?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.
- Review the current result. Ask permission to explore a related need. Treat the new scope as a fresh discovery process.
- Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “How many people attend on your busiest day, and what do they need to do?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
- Use evidence relevant to the decision: a tour using the team’s proposed weekly schedule. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
- Identify a genuinely useful additional scope or decide that expansion would be premature.
An industry-specific concern
Buyer: “A permanent office looks cheaper per desk.”
Possible response: “Let us compare the expected use, meeting facilities, service costs and commitment period on the same basis.”
Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.
Run the practice
- Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays an operations manager arranging space for a hybrid team. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
- Have a five-minute conversation focused on explore an additional need only after establishing that the existing work is useful. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
- Add this challenge: A senior sponsor wants a wider rollout but the current users still have unresolved issues. Make those dependencies explicit.
- Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
- Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to trial an agreed team day and review the room and desk experience. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.
What to avoid
| Common mistake | Using customer loyalty as a reason to skip qualification. |
|---|---|
| A stronger direction | Before extending this, we should check the new team’s goals, constraints and decision process. |
| Scope and claim boundary | Do not promise availability before checking current inventory. |
| What to measure in real work | fit between booked capacity and the team’s actual attendance. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change. |
An example conversation
Is there another team or workflow facing a similar problem, or should we focus on improving the current one?
Our concern is that attendance varies and meeting rooms are difficult to reserve. Also, peak meeting times and access requirements must fit the available space.
How many people attend on your busiest day, and what do they need to do?
A permanent office looks cheaper per desk.
Let us compare the expected use, meeting facilities, service costs and commitment period on the same basis.
What is different about that team’s requirements?
Your working sheet.
Make the exercise your own. Notes are saved in this browser when storage is available. Download a copy to keep; avoid confidential information on a shared device.
Example: attendance varies and meeting rooms are difficult to reserve; peak meeting times and access requirements must fit the available space.
Example: What is different about that team’s requirements? Industry question: How many people attend on your busiest day, and what do they need to do?
Example: a tour using the team’s proposed weekly schedule. Do not promise availability before checking current inventory.
Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: trial an agreed team day and review the room and desk experience. Confirm the owner and date.
Review your work
This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.
Questions
Who is this coworking spaces exercise for?+
Can I use the example as a script?+
How should I assess the result?+
Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale.
Explore more sales resourcesTake the conversation further.
Read a practical guide to structuring your sales practice, or explore the current London sales masterclass.
Plan your sales practiceExplore Jordan Belfort in London