Corporate catering: lost-deal review
Use this lost-deal review exercise to learn from a buying decision without turning the feedback conversation into another pitch. You are discussing a staffed reception catering package with an event manager arranging a company reception. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.
Record a useful learning, its evidence and a specific improvement to test in future deals.
The situation
In this fictional brief, guest numbers, service times and dietary information arrive late. The buyer wants a clear service plan matched to confirmed headcount and venue access. Your offer is a staffed reception catering package, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.
A relevant delivery constraint is that kitchen access and the final headcount deadline are fixed. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.
| Your counterpart | an event manager arranging a company reception |
|---|---|
| Offer under discussion | a staffed reception catering package |
| Evidence available | a sample menu, service schedule and documented dietary-information process |
| Terms to clarify | Confirm staffing, equipment, dietary handling, service times and cancellation terms. |
How to approach lost-deal review
A useful question for this stage: “At what point did one option become a better fit for you?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.
- Ask permission, keep the discussion short and explore the decision process. Record direct feedback separately from your interpretation.
- Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “How will guest numbers and dietary requirements be confirmed?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
- Use evidence relevant to the decision: a sample menu, service schedule and documented dietary-information process. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
- Record a useful learning, its evidence and a specific improvement to test in future deals.
An industry-specific concern
Buyer: “We want more menu options without increasing the spend.”
Possible response: “We can compare portioning, service format and menu complexity, then agree which choices matter most to the guests.”
Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.
Run the practice
- Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays an event manager arranging a company reception. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
- Have a five-minute conversation focused on learn from a buying decision without turning the feedback conversation into another pitch. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
- Add this challenge: The buyer gives a polite, vague answer. Ask one concrete follow-up, then respect their decision to stop.
- Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
- Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to review the service schedule and confirm a sample menu with the organiser. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.
What to avoid
| Common mistake | Arguing with feedback or asking questions designed to prove the buyer was wrong. |
|---|---|
| A stronger direction | Thank you. What would we have needed to understand earlier? |
| Scope and claim boundary | Never promise an allergen-free environment without verified operational capability. |
| What to measure in real work | delivery against agreed service times and confirmed requirements. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change. |
An example conversation
If you are comfortable sharing, what mattered most in your decision?
Our concern is that guest numbers, service times and dietary information arrive late. Also, kitchen access and the final headcount deadline are fixed.
How will guest numbers and dietary requirements be confirmed?
We want more menu options without increasing the spend.
We can compare portioning, service format and menu complexity, then agree which choices matter most to the guests.
At what point did one option become a better fit for you?
Your working sheet.
Make the exercise your own. Notes are saved in this browser when storage is available. Download a copy to keep; avoid confidential information on a shared device.
Example: guest numbers, service times and dietary information arrive late; kitchen access and the final headcount deadline are fixed.
Example: At what point did one option become a better fit for you? Industry question: How will guest numbers and dietary requirements be confirmed?
Example: a sample menu, service schedule and documented dietary-information process. Never promise an allergen-free environment without verified operational capability.
Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: review the service schedule and confirm a sample menu with the organiser. Confirm the owner and date.
Review your work
This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.
Questions
Who is this corporate catering exercise for?+
Can I use the example as a script?+
How should I assess the result?+
Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale.
Explore more sales resourcesTake the conversation further.
Read a practical guide to structuring your sales practice, or explore the current London sales masterclass.
Plan your sales practiceExplore Jordan Belfort in London