Corporate catering: competitor comparison
Use this competitor comparison exercise to compare alternatives against the buyer’s requirements without attacking another provider. You are discussing a staffed reception catering package with an event manager arranging a company reception. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.
Produce a comparison with evidence, open questions and a clear decision criterion.
The situation
In this fictional brief, guest numbers, service times and dietary information arrive late. The buyer wants a clear service plan matched to confirmed headcount and venue access. Your offer is a staffed reception catering package, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.
A relevant delivery constraint is that kitchen access and the final headcount deadline are fixed. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.
| Your counterpart | an event manager arranging a company reception |
|---|---|
| Offer under discussion | a staffed reception catering package |
| Evidence available | a sample menu, service schedule and documented dietary-information process |
| Terms to clarify | Confirm staffing, equipment, dietary handling, service times and cancellation terms. |
How to approach competitor comparison
A useful question for this stage: “What would you need to verify before deciding that either option meets the requirement?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.
- Build a like-for-like comparison. Mark unknowns as unknown. Ask the buyer to rank the criteria before discussing your strengths.
- Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “How will guest numbers and dietary requirements be confirmed?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
- Use evidence relevant to the decision: a sample menu, service schedule and documented dietary-information process. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
- Produce a comparison with evidence, open questions and a clear decision criterion.
An industry-specific concern
Buyer: “We want more menu options without increasing the spend.”
Possible response: “We can compare portioning, service format and menu complexity, then agree which choices matter most to the guests.”
Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.
Run the practice
- Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays an event manager arranging a company reception. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
- Have a five-minute conversation focused on compare alternatives against the buyer’s requirements without attacking another provider. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
- Add this challenge: The buyer quotes a feature or price you cannot verify. State the limit of your knowledge and compare documented terms.
- Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
- Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to review the service schedule and confirm a sample menu with the organiser. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.
What to avoid
| Common mistake | Claiming the competing provider cannot do something without current evidence. |
|---|---|
| A stronger direction | I do not know their current terms. Here is what our proposal includes and what we should verify in both offers. |
| Scope and claim boundary | Never promise an allergen-free environment without verified operational capability. |
| What to measure in real work | delivery against agreed service times and confirmed requirements. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change. |
An example conversation
Which differences between the two options matter most to your team?
Our concern is that guest numbers, service times and dietary information arrive late. Also, kitchen access and the final headcount deadline are fixed.
How will guest numbers and dietary requirements be confirmed?
We want more menu options without increasing the spend.
We can compare portioning, service format and menu complexity, then agree which choices matter most to the guests.
What would you need to verify before deciding that either option meets the requirement?
Your working sheet.
Make the exercise your own. Notes are saved in this browser when storage is available. Download a copy to keep; avoid confidential information on a shared device.
Example: guest numbers, service times and dietary information arrive late; kitchen access and the final headcount deadline are fixed.
Example: What would you need to verify before deciding that either option meets the requirement? Industry question: How will guest numbers and dietary requirements be confirmed?
Example: a sample menu, service schedule and documented dietary-information process. Never promise an allergen-free environment without verified operational capability.
Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: review the service schedule and confirm a sample menu with the organiser. Confirm the owner and date.
Review your work
This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.
Questions
Who is this corporate catering exercise for?+
Can I use the example as a script?+
How should I assess the result?+
Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale.
Explore more sales resourcesTake the conversation further.
Read a practical guide to structuring your sales practice, or explore the current London sales masterclass.
Plan your sales practiceExplore Jordan Belfort in London