Architecture studios: procurement review
Use this procurement review exercise to answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process. You are discussing an early design and requirements study with a business owner planning a workplace fit-out. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.
Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence.
The situation
In this fictional brief, stakeholders disagree on space use before the project brief is settled. The buyer wants a documented requirements brief and comparable layout options. Your offer is an early design and requirements study, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.
A relevant delivery constraint is that survey information, budget and specialist approvals need confirmation. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.
| Your counterpart | a business owner planning a workplace fit-out |
|---|---|
| Offer under discussion | an early design and requirements study |
| Evidence available | a concept layout annotated with the assumptions it depends on |
| Terms to clarify | Clarify design stages, surveys, consultants, approvals and deliverables. |
How to approach procurement review
A useful question for this stage: “Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.
- Separate mandatory requirements from preferences. Assign owners to unanswered questions. Compare commercial terms on a consistent basis.
- Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which activity must the new space support better than the current one?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
- Use evidence relevant to the decision: a concept layout annotated with the assumptions it depends on. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
- Produce a list of requirements, evidence, outstanding approvals and a realistic decision sequence.
An industry-specific concern
Buyer: “Can you give us a final construction price now?”
Possible response: “At this stage we can document assumptions and coordinate an estimate; a final price needs a developed scope and suitable contractor input.”
Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.
Run the practice
- Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays a business owner planning a workplace fit-out. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
- Have a five-minute conversation focused on answer commercial and delivery questions with evidence and a clear approval process. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
- Add this challenge: Procurement asks for a new obligation late in the process. Explain that it needs review rather than accepting it to save the deal.
- Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
- Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to agree a requirements workshop and an initial layout review. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.
What to avoid
| Common mistake | Promising exceptions that the delivery or legal team has not approved. |
|---|---|
| A stronger direction | I can record that request and confirm the answer with the responsible person before we change the agreement. |
| Scope and claim boundary | Concept designs do not establish regulatory approval or construction cost. |
| What to measure in real work | resolution of the requirements that affect layout and scope. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change. |
An example conversation
Which requirements must be satisfied before procurement can approve the agreement?
Our concern is that stakeholders disagree on space use before the project brief is settled. Also, survey information, budget and specialist approvals need confirmation.
Which activity must the new space support better than the current one?
Can you give us a final construction price now?
At this stage we can document assumptions and coordinate an estimate; a final price needs a developed scope and suitable contractor input.
Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it?
Your working sheet.
Make the exercise your own. Notes are saved in this browser when storage is available. Download a copy to keep; avoid confidential information on a shared device.
Example: stakeholders disagree on space use before the project brief is settled; survey information, budget and specialist approvals need confirmation.
Example: Which item is currently preventing approval, and what evidence would resolve it? Industry question: Which activity must the new space support better than the current one?
Example: a concept layout annotated with the assumptions it depends on. Concept designs do not establish regulatory approval or construction cost.
Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: agree a requirements workshop and an initial layout review. Confirm the owner and date.
Review your work
This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.
Questions
Who is this architecture studios exercise for?+
Can I use the example as a script?+
How should I assess the result?+
Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale.
Explore more sales resourcesTake the conversation further.
Read a practical guide to structuring your sales practice, or explore the current London sales masterclass.
Plan your sales practiceExplore Jordan Belfort in London