Sales practice · 12-minute exercise

Web design studios: price objection handling

Use this price objection handling exercise to identify whether the concern is affordability, comparison, confidence or scope before discussing a concession. You are discussing a focused website redesign with a founder replacing an ageing company website. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.

NEXT MBA EditorialPublished Example + editable working sheet
What you will work towards

Agree what drives the concern and compare at least two honest options, including keeping the original scope.

The situation

In this fictional brief, visitors struggle to understand the offer and find the enquiry form. The buyer wants a clear service journey that works on mobile and desktop. Your offer is a focused website redesign, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.

A relevant delivery constraint is that existing URLs and necessary integrations must remain accounted for. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.

Your counterparta founder replacing an ageing company website
Offer under discussiona focused website redesign
Evidence availablea clickable prototype of one complete enquiry journey
Terms to clarifyDefine page count, revisions, content ownership, redirects and maintenance.

How to approach price objection handling

A useful question for this stage: “If the price stayed the same, which part of the proposal would still feel uncertain?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.

  1. Acknowledge the concern. Identify the comparison and the decision criterion. Make the scope visible before discussing alternatives.
  2. Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “What must a first-time visitor understand before contacting you?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
  3. Use evidence relevant to the decision: a clickable prototype of one complete enquiry journey. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
  4. Agree what drives the concern and compare at least two honest options, including keeping the original scope.

Example exchange

An illustrative exchange. Real conversations will take a different path.

SellerWhen you say the price is too high, what are you comparing it with?

BuyerOur concern is that visitors struggle to understand the offer and find the enquiry form. Also, existing URLs and necessary integrations must remain accounted for.

SellerWhat must a first-time visitor understand before contacting you?

BuyerA template would cost much less.

SellerA template may be enough. Let us list the journeys and integrations you need, then compare the work each option actually includes.

SellerIf the price stayed the same, which part of the proposal would still feel uncertain?

An industry-specific concern

Buyer: “A template would cost much less.”

Possible response: “A template may be enough. Let us list the journeys and integrations you need, then compare the work each option actually includes.”

Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.

Run the practice

  1. Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays a founder replacing an ageing company website. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
  2. Have a five-minute conversation focused on identify whether the concern is affordability, comparison, confidence or scope before discussing a concession. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
  3. Add this challenge: The buyer asks for an immediate percentage discount. You can change scope or timing, but you cannot invent margin or authority.
  4. Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
  5. Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to prototype one high-value service page and its enquiry flow. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.

What to avoid

Common mistakeOffering a discount before discovering what the buyer is worried about.
A stronger directionLet us check whether we are comparing the same scope and responsibilities first.
Scope and claim boundaryDo not promise conversion gains without a measured baseline and suitable comparison.
What to measure in real workcompletion of the intended enquiry journey in a usability review. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change.

Your working sheet

Write your own version below. Notes are saved on this browser when local storage is available. Use Download to keep a separate copy; avoid adding confidential information on a shared device.

Example: visitors struggle to understand the offer and find the enquiry form; existing URLs and necessary integrations must remain accounted for.

Example: If the price stayed the same, which part of the proposal would still feel uncertain? Industry question: What must a first-time visitor understand before contacting you?

Example: a clickable prototype of one complete enquiry journey. Do not promise conversion gains without a measured baseline and suitable comparison.

Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: prototype one high-value service page and its enquiry flow. Confirm the owner and date.

Review your work

Tick only what you can support with your answer or practice. This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.

Questions about this resource

Who is this web design studios exercise for?

Founders, salespeople and account managers preparing for a conversation about a focused website redesign. Adapt the brief to your real offer and authority before using it at work.

Can I use the example as a script?

Use the questions as prompts. Listen and respond to the buyer’s actual meaning. The target is to identify whether the concern is affordability, comparison, confidence or scope before discussing a concession, not to deliver a memorised speech.

How should I assess the result?

Agree what drives the concern and compare at least two honest options, including keeping the original scope. Use the three review questions below. The checklist is for reflection; it is not a validated prediction of sales performance.

Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale. About these resources.