Sales practice · 12-minute exercise

Packaging suppliers: decision-maker alignment

Use this decision-maker alignment exercise to understand who uses, evaluates, funds and approves the work without dismissing the person in front of you. You are discussing a packaging development and supply order with an operations lead launching a physical product. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.

NEXT MBA EditorialPublished Example + editable working sheet
What you will work towards

Agree a stakeholder map and a useful, permission-based way to answer outstanding questions.

The situation

In this fictional brief, design, packing efficiency and transport requirements are not aligned. The buyer wants a specification tested against the actual product and packing process. Your offer is a packaging development and supply order, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.

A relevant delivery constraint is that minimum order quantities and artwork approval affect the schedule. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.

Your counterpartan operations lead launching a physical product
Offer under discussiona packaging development and supply order
Evidence availablea physical sample with dimensions, material and agreed test results
Terms to clarifyConfirm specifications, tooling ownership, tolerances, lead times and reorders.

How to approach decision-maker alignment

A useful question for this stage: “What would help you explain this proposal internally?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.

  1. Map roles rather than job titles alone. Ask your contact how they would like others involved and what information those people need.
  2. Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which failure matters most: damage, packing time, shelf fit or presentation?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
  3. Use evidence relevant to the decision: a physical sample with dimensions, material and agreed test results. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
  4. Agree a stakeholder map and a useful, permission-based way to answer outstanding questions.

Example exchange

An illustrative exchange. Real conversations will take a different path.

SellerWho will use the result, and who needs confidence in the decision?

BuyerOur concern is that design, packing efficiency and transport requirements are not aligned. Also, minimum order quantities and artwork approval affect the schedule.

SellerWhich failure matters most: damage, packing time, shelf fit or presentation?

BuyerWe need a smaller order at the same unit price.

SellerWe can compare material, tooling and production setup costs, then price a smaller batch or an alternative specification.

SellerWhat would help you explain this proposal internally?

An industry-specific concern

Buyer: “We need a smaller order at the same unit price.”

Possible response: “We can compare material, tooling and production setup costs, then price a smaller batch or an alternative specification.”

Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.

Run the practice

  1. Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays an operations lead launching a physical product. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
  2. Have a five-minute conversation focused on understand who uses, evaluates, funds and approves the work without dismissing the person in front of you. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
  3. Add this challenge: Your contact supports the idea but cannot share an approver’s details. Offer a concise decision brief they can use.
  4. Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
  5. Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to approve a sample and a limited packing trial before the full order. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.

What to avoid

Common mistakeAsking to bypass your contact because they are not the final approver.
A stronger directionYou know the internal process best. How can we help you prepare a useful discussion with the other stakeholders?
Scope and claim boundaryDo not make unsupported sustainability or recyclability claims.
What to measure in real workpass rate against the agreed sample and packing checks. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change.

Your working sheet

Write your own version below. Notes are saved on this browser when local storage is available. Use Download to keep a separate copy; avoid adding confidential information on a shared device.

Example: design, packing efficiency and transport requirements are not aligned; minimum order quantities and artwork approval affect the schedule.

Example: What would help you explain this proposal internally? Industry question: Which failure matters most: damage, packing time, shelf fit or presentation?

Example: a physical sample with dimensions, material and agreed test results. Do not make unsupported sustainability or recyclability claims.

Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: approve a sample and a limited packing trial before the full order. Confirm the owner and date.

Review your work

Tick only what you can support with your answer or practice. This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.

Questions about this resource

Who is this packaging suppliers exercise for?

Founders, salespeople and account managers preparing for a conversation about a packaging development and supply order. Adapt the brief to your real offer and authority before using it at work.

Can I use the example as a script?

Use the questions as prompts. Listen and respond to the buyer’s actual meaning. The target is to understand who uses, evaluates, funds and approves the work without dismissing the person in front of you, not to deliver a memorised speech.

How should I assess the result?

Agree a stakeholder map and a useful, permission-based way to answer outstanding questions. Use the three review questions below. The checklist is for reflection; it is not a validated prediction of sales performance.

Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale. About these resources.