Sales practice · 12-minute exercise

Logistics providers: competitor comparison

Use this competitor comparison exercise to compare alternatives against the buyer’s requirements without attacking another provider. You are discussing a defined shipping and exception-management service with an operations manager shipping business orders. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.

NEXT MBA EditorialPublished Example + editable working sheet
What you will work towards

Produce a comparison with evidence, open questions and a clear decision criterion.

The situation

In this fictional brief, customers hear about delivery problems before the operations team. The buyer wants a visible process for shipment updates and exceptions. Your offer is a defined shipping and exception-management service, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.

A relevant delivery constraint is that service depends on shipment dimensions, routes and agreed cut-off times. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.

Your counterpartan operations manager shipping business orders
Offer under discussiona defined shipping and exception-management service
Evidence availablea sample shipment timeline including a missed collection and escalation
Terms to clarifyList shipment assumptions, exclusions, surcharges and claims procedures.

How to approach competitor comparison

A useful question for this stage: “What would you need to verify before deciding that either option meets the requirement?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.

  1. Build a like-for-like comparison. Mark unknowns as unknown. Ask the buyer to rank the criteria before discussing your strengths.
  2. Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Which delivery exception creates the most work for your team?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
  3. Use evidence relevant to the decision: a sample shipment timeline including a missed collection and escalation. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
  4. Produce a comparison with evidence, open questions and a clear decision criterion.

Example exchange

An illustrative exchange. Real conversations will take a different path.

SellerWhich differences between the two options matter most to your team?

BuyerOur concern is that customers hear about delivery problems before the operations team. Also, service depends on shipment dimensions, routes and agreed cut-off times.

SellerWhich delivery exception creates the most work for your team?

BuyerA competitor quoted a lower shipping rate.

SellerLet us compare the same shipment profile, surcharges, collection terms and exception support.

SellerWhat would you need to verify before deciding that either option meets the requirement?

An industry-specific concern

Buyer: “A competitor quoted a lower shipping rate.”

Possible response: “Let us compare the same shipment profile, surcharges, collection terms and exception support.”

Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.

Run the practice

  1. Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays an operations manager shipping business orders. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
  2. Have a five-minute conversation focused on compare alternatives against the buyer’s requirements without attacking another provider. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
  3. Add this challenge: The buyer quotes a feature or price you cannot verify. State the limit of your knowledge and compare documented terms.
  4. Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
  5. Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to test a clearly specified shipment lane and review the exception process. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.

What to avoid

Common mistakeClaiming the competing provider cannot do something without current evidence.
A stronger directionI do not know their current terms. Here is what our proposal includes and what we should verify in both offers.
Scope and claim boundaryDo not guarantee customs clearance or transit times outside an agreed service.
What to measure in real workdelivery performance against the agreed service definition. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change.

Your working sheet

Write your own version below. Notes are saved on this browser when local storage is available. Use Download to keep a separate copy; avoid adding confidential information on a shared device.

Example: customers hear about delivery problems before the operations team; service depends on shipment dimensions, routes and agreed cut-off times.

Example: What would you need to verify before deciding that either option meets the requirement? Industry question: Which delivery exception creates the most work for your team?

Example: a sample shipment timeline including a missed collection and escalation. Do not guarantee customs clearance or transit times outside an agreed service.

Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: test a clearly specified shipment lane and review the exception process. Confirm the owner and date.

Review your work

Tick only what you can support with your answer or practice. This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.

Questions about this resource

Who is this logistics providers exercise for?

Founders, salespeople and account managers preparing for a conversation about a defined shipping and exception-management service. Adapt the brief to your real offer and authority before using it at work.

Can I use the example as a script?

Use the questions as prompts. Listen and respond to the buyer’s actual meaning. The target is to compare alternatives against the buyer’s requirements without attacking another provider, not to deliver a memorised speech.

How should I assess the result?

Produce a comparison with evidence, open questions and a clear decision criterion. Use the three review questions below. The checklist is for reflection; it is not a validated prediction of sales performance.

Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale. About these resources.