Ecommerce agencies: pilot proposal
Use this pilot proposal exercise to design a small engagement that resolves a real uncertainty and has a clear stop or proceed decision. You are discussing a store conversion and merchandising review with the owner of an online store. The point of the practice is to make a useful decision together, including recognising when the offer is not a fit.
Agree a bounded trial with evidence requirements and a review date, without implying expansion is automatic.
The situation
In this fictional brief, customers hesitate at product selection or checkout. The buyer wants a prioritised set of customer-journey improvements. Your offer is a store conversion and merchandising review, but you must first establish whether its scope addresses the actual need.
A relevant delivery constraint is that changes must preserve payment, inventory and fulfilment integrations. Treat that as a fact in the exercise; do not remove it to make the sale easier.
| Your counterpart | the owner of an online store |
|---|---|
| Offer under discussion | a store conversion and merchandising review |
| Evidence available | a recorded walkthrough with observed friction and a testable hypothesis |
| Terms to clarify | Define platform access, implementation, measurement and rollback responsibility. |
How to approach pilot proposal
A useful question for this stage: “What evidence would make you decide not to expand?” Ask it when the conversation creates a reason for it, rather than reciting every question in order.
- Define a narrow scope, a baseline, an owner and success criteria. Include a stop condition and the decision after the pilot.
- Ground the discussion in the buyer’s work. Ask: “Where does a customer need information that the store does not provide?” Listen for a concrete example before making a claim.
- Use evidence relevant to the decision: a recorded walkthrough with observed friction and a testable hypothesis. Explain what it demonstrates and what remains unverified.
- Agree a bounded trial with evidence requirements and a review date, without implying expansion is automatic.
An industry-specific concern
Buyer: “We only want more traffic.”
Possible response: “More traffic may help, but let us first check whether visitors can choose the product and complete checkout without avoidable friction.”
Why this response helps: it acknowledges the concern, brings the discussion back to a verifiable requirement and leaves room for a different decision. Adapt the wording to what the buyer actually said.
Run the practice
- Prepare for two minutes. One person takes the seller role and one plays the owner of an online store. Read the offer and constraint separately from your preferred answer.
- Have a five-minute conversation focused on design a small engagement that resolves a real uncertainty and has a clear stop or proceed decision. The buyer should answer consistently with the brief and ask for evidence when a claim is vague.
- Add this challenge: The buyer wants an open-ended free trial. Explain the work involved and propose a finite evaluation with clear responsibilities.
- Pause for feedback. Quote one useful question and one missed opportunity. Repeat the difficult exchange using a different response.
- Finish by writing the actual agreement. A sensible option, when it fits, is to review one product category and one checkout journey. A clear decision to pause is also a useful outcome.
What to avoid
| Common mistake | Calling a discounted full project a pilot without a learning objective. |
|---|---|
| A stronger direction | Let us test the uncertain part first and agree what the result will and will not tell us. |
| Scope and claim boundary | A heuristic review does not prove a conversion uplift. |
| What to measure in real work | checkout completion for a defined audience and period. Establish a baseline and definition before interpreting a change. |
An example conversation
Which question would a small trial need to answer before you considered a wider engagement?
Our concern is that customers hesitate at product selection or checkout. Also, changes must preserve payment, inventory and fulfilment integrations.
Where does a customer need information that the store does not provide?
We only want more traffic.
More traffic may help, but let us first check whether visitors can choose the product and complete checkout without avoidable friction.
What evidence would make you decide not to expand?
Your working sheet.
Make the exercise your own. Notes are saved in this browser when storage is available. Download a copy to keep; avoid confidential information on a shared device.
Example: customers hesitate at product selection or checkout; changes must preserve payment, inventory and fulfilment integrations.
Example: What evidence would make you decide not to expand? Industry question: Where does a customer need information that the store does not provide?
Example: a recorded walkthrough with observed friction and a testable hypothesis. A heuristic review does not prove a conversion uplift.
Example: Propose a clear next step, such as: review one product category and one checkout journey. Confirm the owner and date.
Review your work
This is a reflection checklist, not an automated assessment.
Questions
Who is this ecommerce agencies exercise for?+
Can I use the example as a script?+
How should I assess the result?+
Fictional training scenario. The dialogue illustrates response choices; it is not a customer testimonial or a record of a real sale.
Explore more sales resourcesTake the conversation further.
Read a practical guide to structuring your sales practice, or explore the current London sales masterclass.
Plan your sales practiceExplore Jordan Belfort in London